tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948976019240936827.post5451827658164364430..comments2023-09-13T06:41:50.786-07:00Comments on Global Warming and Nuclear Energy: How to Solve the United States' Worst Economic and Environmental ProblemsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948976019240936827.post-80085229800203736842010-06-08T07:08:50.272-07:002010-06-08T07:08:50.272-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.viagra onlinehttp://www.safemeds.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948976019240936827.post-65215864608814429262008-09-17T23:28:00.000-07:002008-09-17T23:28:00.000-07:00Here's a good example: Say you have 2 people. They...Here's a good example: Say you have 2 people. They both attend stanford for a career in, say, economics. They both want to work for microsoft. But, here's the catch: one lives in San Francisco, and the other in New Delhi. They both graduate with nearly identical grades and stats. Now, Microsoft will hire only one of them. Which one gets hired?<BR/><BR/>A: the man from New Delhi. It will cost Microsoft $15000 a year to get him on a good base. It will cost $70000 for the man from San Francisco. Since major companies only care about money, they will take the Indian man and leave the U.S. man unemployed. Put that on a scale of ten million people with similar situations, and you have mass unemployment, and that kills our economy. The major companies only care about what they can get for their money, not what they can do for the US economy. Outsourcing is killing our economy, tooUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11654197048925227987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948976019240936827.post-56129281253918582542008-04-03T19:22:00.000-07:002008-04-03T19:22:00.000-07:00Well said, Robert!Well said, Robert!Red Craighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17747325685399501190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948976019240936827.post-90823901131474889542008-04-03T16:35:00.000-07:002008-04-03T16:35:00.000-07:00Good comment. Quality of life should be the true ...Good comment. <BR/><BR/>Quality of life should be the true bottom line rather than just how much stuff people can consume. <BR/><BR/>Nuclear is part of the solution along with a movement toward voluntary simplicity. New technology can use less energy such as tele-coumuting via the Internet rather than driving to work.<BR/><BR/>Solar and wind are good energy sources also. <BR/><BR/>It seems like we have been floundering for years. Sustainable lifestyles and economics is a good focus. Still there are a lot of potential wild goose chases along the way like much of the bio-fuel industry that may create more greenhouse gas than equivalent energy from fossil fuel.<BR/><BR/>Car free lifestyles should be promoted and also child free lifestyles for a larger segment of the population.Theslowlane Robert Ashworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10082164332880198884noreply@blogger.com