tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948976019240936827.post5969707320542012081..comments2023-09-13T06:41:50.786-07:00Comments on Global Warming and Nuclear Energy: Surprising Poll ResultsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948976019240936827.post-42376366217970544772008-07-06T20:48:00.000-07:002008-07-06T20:48:00.000-07:00Alexandra, thanks for your comment. By the way, t...Alexandra, thanks for your comment. By the way, the articles you publish at Atom Watch are greatly appreciated as a way of keeping us up-to-date on international developments.<BR/><BR/>Actually, I don't think the media should promote nuclear energy. I just wish they'd give their audiences reliable information. Your point is well taken, that greenhouse gases don't seem threatening.<BR/><BR/>Keep up the good work.<BR/>RedRed Craighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17747325685399501190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948976019240936827.post-17585846350654512532008-07-06T14:21:00.000-07:002008-07-06T14:21:00.000-07:00I completely agree with the statement that the med...I completely agree with the statement that the media are not doing a good job in promoting nuclear. Coal and fossil fuels are much more "familiar" and well-understood from the point of "how it works", while nuclear can be easily portrayed as something dangerous because of very few people out of general public understand properly how nuclear works and what are the consequences of this operation. Media often mention Chernobyl and Three Mile Island when speaking about nuclear, and that is much more horrifying for uncle John in front of TV then some kind of greenhouse gases that do not seem as dangerous to him - due to the media image. I suppose that mistake will become a subject of change in the nearest future.Alexandra Prokopenkohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13558622592614895887noreply@blogger.com